HilmarX (Twitter) profile trust report
founder @gelatonetwork | @arrakisfinance
Algorithmic trust score
Looks genuine
Higher scores indicate fewer risk signals.
- Last assessed
- Score based on
- 1 observer
- Engine version
- vv1.6.0
- Evidence coverage
- Limited signals
Some signals were unavailable. Read this score with extra caution.
How is this score calculated?Public signals on this account are consistent with a genuine person or organisation.
This report uses public signals. It cannot verify identity or guarantee safety.
Your account? Request a review or removal
Scan activity
- Scanned by
- 1
- xlegit user has shared evidence for this profile.
- Account age
- 10 years
- On X since October 2015.
- Published assessments
- 1
- First scored 23 Sept 2026.
- Community reports
- 0
- User reports, shown separately from the algorithmic score.
Topics and tone
This sample often discusses money & markets. A consistent tone is not clear yet.
Recurring topics
Money & markets
Writing tone
Not established from this sample
Formats
Not established from this sample
Based on 20 sampled own posts. This describes the writing, not the person or their expertise. It does not affect the trust score.
Read the sample
Is anything these days still happening on @ethereum? Seems to me like it’s completely missing out on any of the recent excitement around tokenized stocks, memecoins, perps, etc. @solana and @RobinhoodCrypto definitely own most of the current builder activity. The rest follow.
@0xZergs lol wut?
.@UsePaid is really interesting, pay Memecoin creator fee directly to some X’s account via @XMoney. Memecoin innovation is crazy rn can’t lie.
turns out memecoins did end up poisoning the well for real crypto adoption in the US. looking at the latest @HunterBiden $LAPTOP fiasco, the argument that individuals like trump extracted billions from retail crowd is getting harder to argue with. https://t.co/DUnSEGRUPh
@keoneHD @BrianInCrypto There will be a trade off between how much computation you can do onchain to route just in time vs indexing everything off chain (including liquidity on other chains) to provide the best quote but have the risk of spoofing which you need to deal with using LP scoring. Do you
@keoneHD @BrianInCrypto It seems like a cat and mouse game between aggregators and market makers. Aggregators will need to backlist MMs who spoof, but will always aim to first give them the benefit of the doubt first in order to tap into their liquidity to provide better user quotes. For me it feels
@HunterBiden you should have used @ArrakisFinance for your onchain liqudity, we have helped launch thousands of tokens onchain with no hiccups like these. Don’t trust any shady market makers. Control it yourself with Arrakis!
At this point hardware security companies have proven time and again that they are unable to adequately protect themselves and their users against malicious third parties. https://t.co/mj3RGA3ivM
It's 2026 and L2s like @RobinhoodCrypto still congest for days when a couple thousand people trade memecoins.
@Route2FI <3
@Route2FI download fomo
@hagaetc Hope
@_ermin @ArrakisFinance fixes this.
@stutireal lol
@KobeissiLetter A lot of wash trading happened on BNB chain in July so I would discount that and work with around $5bn of monthly volume as an assumption for now
SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce: "I would particularly welcome thoughts on facilitating the ability of crypto assets to serve a role akin to equity to enable token holders to share in the growth and value of the enterprise that builds a crypto network." This would be the https://t.co/IlDsDuH8jA
@RobMcStodda @guil_lambert I think the interesting part of all of this discussion is not through which primitives trades will route eg AMMs, propAMMs, etc but who will be the person holding the inventory risk, providing the liquidity and how that impacts fees charged to traders.
@JasonYanowitz That’s from trading incentives from eg Robinhood chain
@DefiIgnas @mzeller I guess other stablecoin card projects still have to prove they can grow in the absence of incentivized cash back programs. It seems like once gnosis stopped paying people, the growth flatlined, which makes sense as at least in Europe, there isn’t a big benefit in crypto cards.
@pitdesi one has to consider that the revenue from net interest margin, which should mostly be paid for leverage on equities (around 215 million, i.e. ~17% of total revenue), is still larger than prediction market revenue (being around ~12% of total revenue).
Open this profile in the extension and choose “Adapt this style for my account” to build a voice guide and content plan from your own ideas.
Before you trust, follow or reply
A closer look at what the available evidence tells us, and what it leaves open.
Still an open question
Scams & suspicious requests
The available checks did not surface a clear scam warning. That does not tell us whether every offer or link is safe.
Check the destination and the terms of any request for money or personal information.
Still an open question
Identity & impersonation
We have not established who runs this account. A familiar photo, a badge or a high score cannot settle that on its own.
Use the person’s or organisation’s own website to confirm the account when identity matters.
Still an open question
Useful, original content
There is not enough evidence here to say how much original, useful detail this profile adds.
Read a few complete posts. Look for clear examples, sources and answers that help with your interests.
Still an open question
Rage bait & clickbait
The available checks did not establish a repeated bait pattern. A short sample can still miss it.
Look for a clear point or useful detail behind a dramatic headline.
Fig. 01
The signals behind the score
Account age
The account has an established history. That gives you more context to review, but older accounts can still change hands.
Time-of-day pattern
This part of the available activity adds reassuring context. Read it alongside the other checks; it is not a guarantee of safety.
Mix of originals, replies and retweets
This part of the available activity adds reassuring context. Read it alongside the other checks; it is not a guarantee of safety.
Fig. 02
Score breakdown
Each bar shows the points earned in one dimension. Missing dimensions were not assessed. A hard risk signal can override the combined result. Read about the signals on the algorithm page.
- Account fingerprint25 / 25 pts
- Content originality19.2 / 25 pts
- Behavioral patterns12.8 / 15 pts
- Network quality9 / 15 pts
- Engagement authenticity8.8 / 15 pts
- Visual identity3 / 5 pts
Fig. 03
Score history
One daily snapshot so far. This chart records the published assessment for each day with a score.
Show as a table
| Date | Score | Observers |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Sept 2026 | 79 · Looks genuine | 1 |
Fig. 04
Community reports
These reports come from xlegit users. They appear alongside the trust score and do not change the number.
- Active reports
- 0
- Distinct reporters
- 0
- Community score
- 0/ 100
- A higher score means stronger concern from community reports. Each report is weighted by the reporter’s history.
There are no active community reports for this profile. Users submit reports from the extension. No reports does not guarantee that an account is safe.
Reading the report
What this report can tell you
Can this tell me whether @hilmarxo is a bot?
It can help you spot signs of automation, fake accounts or scams, but it cannot prove who is behind an account. A high score does not verify identity. A low score does not prove wrongdoing. Read the reasons and check important claims for yourself.
How current is this assessment?
The published score was assessed on . This page refreshes hourly. Reloading it does not run a new scan. To request a fresh check, open the profile in X with the Chrome extension installed.
Why might community reports disagree?
Reports reflect users’ experiences and are weighted by their reporting history. They are separate from the trust score and have not been independently verified. If no reports appear, it means no active reports are available in xlegit. It does not mean the account is safe.
Check profiles while you browse X
Check profiles while browsing X with the xlegit Chrome extension. Free includes 5 scans a day, up to 30 a month, plus 15 post checks a day. Pro adds 200 daily post checks, Link guard, Focus mode and timeline badges.
Is this your account?
If you think the score is wrong, you can ask us to review it. You can also ask for your score to be withheld. We will explain our decision and correct the assessment when needed.
Request a review of @hilmarxoReport generated 23 Sept 2026, refreshed hourly. Not affiliated with X Corp.